Incidental Pulmonary Nodule (Fleischner / NCCN)

Management and follow-up calculator for incidental solid and subsolid pulmonary nodules using Fleischner and NCCN guidelines.

Criteria and references

Text summary of the rules this calculator applies, generated from the same definitions the calculation uses.

Identification

System:
Fleischner Society 2017 / NCCN
Version or year:
Fleischner 2017; NCCN NSCLC v6.2026
Responsible organization:
Fleischner Society; National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)
Last updated:

Who it applies to and exclusions

The Fleischner 2017 guidelines apply to incidental pulmonary nodules (found outside a screening program) in adults ≥ 35 years, excluding immunosuppressed patients or those with known cancer. The minimum size threshold for recommending follow-up is based on an estimated cancer risk on the order of ≥ 1%.

Input variables

VariableDefinitionPossible valuesUnit
Does it meet ALL of these criteria?Density: solid, non-calcified, no fat; Borders: smooth, well-defined, no arterial attachment; Size: ≤ 12 mm maximum diameter; No red flags for malignancy (e.g., spiculation, pleural/fissural retraction, or not being influenced by neighboring structures)Yes · NoYes / No
Is it a fissural nodule?Location: major, minor, or accessory fissure; Shape: lentiform or polygonal in ≥ 2 orthogonal viewsYes · NoYes / No
Is it a juxtapleural nodule?Location: ≤ 15 mm of the visceral pleura AND in the lower lobe, middle lobe, or lingula; Shape: oval (not spherical) in 3 orthogonal views, OR lentiform/polygonal in ≥ 2 viewsYes · NoYes / No
Reference framework for the recommendation—Fleischner 2017 · NCCN (incidental nodule algorithm)Categorical
Nodule typeSubsolid nodules (ground-glass or part-solid) require longer follow-up than solid nodules because in situ/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma can grow slowly. For multiple subsolid nodules, both frameworks agree on management guided by the most suspicious nodule.Solid · Subsolid - part-solid · Subsolid - pure ground-glassCategorical
Number of nodules—Single · MultipleCategorical
Patient risk (solid nodules only)Size is measured as the average of the long- and short-axis diameters on thin-section CT (≤ 1.5 mm). "High risk" includes significant smoking history or other lung cancer risk factors; the risk category is only defined for solid nodules, not for subsolid ones, in either framework.Low risk · High risk (significant smoking history or other factors)Categorical
Size (mm, average of diameters)Size is measured as the average of the long- and short-axis diameters on thin-section CT (≤ 1.5 mm). "High risk" includes significant smoking history or other lung cancer risk factors; the risk category is only defined for solid nodules, not for subsolid ones, in either framework.e.g. 7mm

Rules

Step 1: perifissural nodule (PFN)

Before applying the size-based algorithm, assess whether the nodule meets the criteria for a perifissural nodule (PFN) — the CT representation of an intrapulmonary lymph node (IPLN), typically benign — which does not require further follow-up.

  1. Does it meet ALL of these criteria? (Density: solid, non-calcified, no fat; Borders: smooth, well-defined, no arterial attachment; Size: ≤ 12 mm maximum diameter; No red flags for malignancy (e.g., spiculation, pleural/fissural retraction, or not being influenced by neighboring structures)). Yes → Is it a fissural nodule?. No → Not a perifissural nodule.
  2. Is it a fissural nodule? (Location: major, minor, or accessory fissure; Shape: lentiform or polygonal in ≥ 2 orthogonal views). Yes → Perifissural nodule (PFN). No → Is it a juxtapleural nodule?.
  3. Is it a juxtapleural nodule? (Location: ≤ 15 mm of the visceral pleura AND in the lower lobe, middle lobe, or lingula; Shape: oval (not spherical) in 3 orthogonal views, OR lentiform/polygonal in ≥ 2 views). Yes → Perifissural nodule (PFN). No → Not a perifissural nodule.

Step 1 (perifissural nodule / PFN) is based on the decision tree from Schreuder et al. (Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging 2020), which standardizes four prior PFN definitions from the literature. It applies only to solid, non-calcified, fat-free nodules of typical morphology; a nodule that does not meet Step 1 simply continues down the usual Fleischner/NCCN pathway — that alone does not imply higher suspicion of malignancy.

Recommendations — Fleischner 2017

Nodule typeNumber of nodulesPatient risk (solid nodules only)SizeRecommendation
SolidSingleLow risk< 6 mmNo routine follow-up needed.
SolidSingleLow risk6–8 mmCT at 6-12 months; then consider CT at 18-24 months.
SolidSingleLow risk> 8 mmConsider CT at 3 months, PET/CT, or tissue sampling.
SolidSingleHigh risk (significant smoking history or other factors)< 6 mmOptional CT at 12 months. Nodules < 6 mm do not require routine follow-up, but in high-risk patients with suspicious nodule morphology, upper-lobe location, or both, 12-month follow-up may be warranted.
SolidSingleHigh risk (significant smoking history or other factors)6–8 mmCT at 6-12 months, then CT at 18-24 months.
SolidSingleHigh risk (significant smoking history or other factors)> 8 mmConsider CT at 3 months, PET/CT, or tissue sampling.
SolidMultipleLow risk< 6 mmNo routine follow-up needed.
SolidMultipleLow risk≥ 6 mmCT at 3-6 months; then consider CT at 18-24 months.
SolidMultipleHigh risk (significant smoking history or other factors)< 6 mmOptional CT at 12 months. Nodules < 6 mm do not require routine follow-up, but in high-risk patients with suspicious nodule morphology, upper-lobe location, or both, 12-month follow-up may be warranted.
SolidMultipleHigh risk (significant smoking history or other factors)≥ 6 mmCT at 3-6 months, then CT at 18-24 months.
Subsolid - part-solidSingleNot applicable< 6 mmNo routine follow-up needed.
Subsolid - part-solidSingleNot applicable≥ 6 mmCT at 3-6 months to confirm persistence; if unchanged and the solid component remains < 6 mm, annual CT for a minimum of 5 years; if the solid component grows or is suspicious, consider PET/CT, biopsy, or resection.
Subsolid - part-solidMultipleNot applicable< 6 mmCT at 3-6 months; if stable, consider CT at 2 and 4 years (especially in high-risk patients).
Subsolid - part-solidMultipleNot applicable≥ 6 mmCT at 3-6 months; subsequent management guided by the most suspicious nodule(s).
Subsolid - pure ground-glassSingleNot applicable< 6 mmNo routine follow-up needed.
Subsolid - pure ground-glassSingleNot applicable≥ 6 mmCT at 6-12 months to confirm persistence; if persistent, CT every 2 years until 5 years.
Subsolid - pure ground-glassMultipleNot applicable< 6 mmCT at 3-6 months; if stable, consider CT at 2 and 4 years (especially in high-risk patients).
Subsolid - pure ground-glassMultipleNot applicable≥ 6 mmCT at 3-6 months; subsequent management guided by the most suspicious nodule(s).

For single solid nodules, the > 8 mm threshold triggers a more active work-up (CT at 3 months, PET/CT, or biopsy); for multiple solid nodules, even above 8 mm, Fleischner keeps the more conservative CT at 3-6 months pathway (the dominant nodule is prioritized). Difference between frameworks: the NCCN incidental nodule table does not distinguish between single and multiple solid nodules (it uses the same size/risk-based management for both) — that count-based distinction is specific to Fleischner 2017.

Recommendations — NCCN (incidental nodule algorithm)

Nodule typeNumber of nodulesPatient risk (solid nodules only)SizeRecommendation
SolidAnyLow risk< 6 mmNo routine follow-up.
SolidAnyLow risk6–8 mmCT at 6-12 months; if stable, consider CT at 18-24 months.
SolidAnyLow risk> 8 mmConsider CT at 3 months, PET/CT, or biopsy.
SolidAnyHigh risk (significant smoking history or other factors)< 6 mmCT at 12 months (optional); if stable, no routine follow-up.
SolidAnyHigh risk (significant smoking history or other factors)6–8 mmCT at 6-12 months; if stable, repeat CT at 18-24 months.
SolidAnyHigh risk (significant smoking history or other factors)> 8 mmConsider CT at 3 months, PET/CT, or biopsy.
Subsolid - part-solidSingleNot applicable< 6 mmNo routine follow-up.
Subsolid - part-solidSingleNot applicable≥ 6 mmCT at 3-6 months to confirm no growth/change in the solid component; then annual CT for 5 years. If solid component ≥ 6 mm, consider PET/CT or biopsy.
Subsolid - part-solidMultipleNot applicable< 6 mmCT at 3-6 months; if stable, consider CT at 2 and 4 years.
Subsolid - part-solidMultipleNot applicable≥ 6 mmCT at 3-6 months; subsequent management guided by the most suspicious nodule(s).
Subsolid - pure ground-glassSingleNot applicable< 6 mmNo routine follow-up.
Subsolid - pure ground-glassSingleNot applicable≥ 6 mmCT at 6-12 months to confirm no growth or new solid component; then CT every 2 years until 5 years.
Subsolid - pure ground-glassMultipleNot applicable< 6 mmCT at 3-6 months; if stable, consider CT at 2 and 4 years.
Subsolid - pure ground-glassMultipleNot applicable≥ 6 mmCT at 3-6 months; subsequent management guided by the most suspicious nodule(s).

Table based on the incidental nodule algorithm from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, v6.2026 (pages DIAG-2 and DIAG-3). NCCN updates its guidelines frequently; verify the current version at NCCN.org (free registration required) before basing clinical decisions solely on this table.

Possible results

Step 1 result

  • Perifissural nodule (PFN): Most likely represents an intrapulmonary lymph node (IPLN), typically benign. No further follow-up is recommended for this finding.
  • Not a perifissural nodule: Does not meet PFN criteria. Continue with the standard size-based evaluation (Fleischner / NCCN) below.

Possible recommendations — Fleischner 2017

  • No routine follow-up needed.
  • CT at 6-12 months; then consider CT at 18-24 months.
  • Consider CT at 3 months, PET/CT, or tissue sampling.
  • Optional CT at 12 months. Nodules < 6 mm do not require routine follow-up, but in high-risk patients with suspicious nodule morphology, upper-lobe location, or both, 12-month follow-up may be warranted.
  • CT at 6-12 months, then CT at 18-24 months.
  • CT at 3-6 months; then consider CT at 18-24 months.
  • CT at 3-6 months, then CT at 18-24 months.
  • CT at 3-6 months to confirm persistence; if unchanged and the solid component remains < 6 mm, annual CT for a minimum of 5 years; if the solid component grows or is suspicious, consider PET/CT, biopsy, or resection.
  • CT at 3-6 months; if stable, consider CT at 2 and 4 years (especially in high-risk patients).
  • CT at 3-6 months; subsequent management guided by the most suspicious nodule(s).
  • CT at 6-12 months to confirm persistence; if persistent, CT every 2 years until 5 years.

Possible recommendations — NCCN (incidental nodule algorithm)

  • No routine follow-up.
  • CT at 6-12 months; if stable, consider CT at 18-24 months.
  • Consider CT at 3 months, PET/CT, or biopsy.
  • CT at 12 months (optional); if stable, no routine follow-up.
  • CT at 6-12 months; if stable, repeat CT at 18-24 months.
  • CT at 3-6 months to confirm no growth/change in the solid component; then annual CT for 5 years. If solid component ≥ 6 mm, consider PET/CT or biopsy.
  • CT at 3-6 months; if stable, consider CT at 2 and 4 years.
  • CT at 3-6 months; subsequent management guided by the most suspicious nodule(s).
  • CT at 6-12 months to confirm no growth or new solid component; then CT every 2 years until 5 years.

References

  1. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. 2017;284(1):228-243. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161659
  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Version 6.2026 (Diagnostic Evaluation algorithm, pages DIAG-2/DIAG-3; NCCN.org).
  3. Schreuder A, Jacobs C, Scholten ET, van Ginneken B, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M. Typical CT features of intrapulmonary lymph nodes: a review. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020;2(4):e190159. doi:10.1148/ryct.2020190159
  4. Bueno J, Landeras L, Chung JH. Updated Fleischner Society guidelines for managing incidental pulmonary nodules: common questions and challenging scenarios. RadioGraphics. 2018;38(5):1337-1350. doi:10.1148/rg.2018180017